Excitement,…Adventure,…Toy Theatre!!!

Do not try this at home.

Do it yourself music recording

Yes, Ladies and Gents, the moment you have all been waiting for has finally arrived,……The new blog post telling you all the latest about our Hansel & Gretel Liquorice theatre show has arrived!

As with Collette and Tim’s previous “meetings” tempers got pretty frayed over the editing of Tim’s lovingly crafted script.  Tim wanted to keep all his lovely dialogue and subtle tones and Collette wanted everything to be shorter and more obvious.  Tim wanted gritty realism, Collette wanted fairytale magic and emotion.

There was another interesting aspect to Tim’s script which I would like to open up for discussion.  As I mentioned in my previous post, the main reason we know the witch in the story is a witch, is because the story teller tells us so, and because she likes to eat children and she lives in an unusual house.  She doesn’t do anything magic at all.

Now, in Tim’s script, he has deliberately not mentioned the word “witch”.  The character is simply referred to by the children as “the old lady”.  Now I am not sure how I feel about this.  I was very keen for her to seem sweet and innocent to begin with, but if after she starts behaving horribly towards the children, she is a “normal” person who chooses to behave in this dreadful way, what impression would that give the audience?  Would it be a lot nastier and more scary if it is a horrible badly behaved old woman who gets pushed in the oven by Gretel?  Is this going to promote capital punishment and taking the law into our own hands?  If she is a witch, does it make it slightly better because she is a magical being of some sort and part of the whole “not to be taken seriously” allegorical nature of the fairytale?

Those who remember “Spitting Image” will know, that there is a lot one can get away with subject matter wise simply by using puppets to do it.  Puppets are not realistic, they can say what they want and they are only puppets, (the fact that a human being is actually putting words into their mouth is something you can get away with).  It is similar with “The Simpsons”.  Because it is a cartoon the format lets the makers of the show deal with challenging subject matter and no-one bats an eyelid.  Despite the fact that it is obviously a show with adult content, many parents let their kids watch it because it is a cartoon.  I would like my show to be scary, but at a suitable level for young children.  On the other hand, one doesn’t want to cater to the scaredy cat little kid too much.

On one occasion when I was putting on a show in a school; we had not brought out any puppets, we hadn’t said anything and my co-performer and I came on and were just about to start speaking when a girl collapsed into terrified tears and had to be taken out.  We were honestly not alarming in appearance, and I can only think it was the shock of us being real people who were actually there, rather than being safely behind a television screen.  I think the 2-d figures of the toy theatre may do a lot to mitigate any realism in the script as they are very obviously not real.

We have also made a start on the music.  I have been having much fun playing with keyboards, drum machines, actual drums, tin whistles etc. and recording stuff into the computer.  This is the very first time that we are using recorded music for a show.  This is for practical reasons as we will have far too much to do with the scenery and characters to be playing live music too.  Having said that, I am using live type instruments and sound effects and recording them into the computer – they will be transferred to an mp3 player and then played through a very useful pa system of modest proportions as and when necessary.  We are using a very useful piece of free software called “Audacity” and it is a lot of fun finding out how to edit music in this way.

So the next jobs are – mocking up sets and puppets, creating a lighting plan and finishing off the music.  In the meanwhile why not leave your comments or vote in my poll about the “witch” issue mentioned previously.  Watch this space for more news, coming some time next week!

Nice but Naughty?

We’ve been really getting stuck into the plotting and appearance of our Liquorice Toy Theatre, Hansel and Gretel show.

Tim is about two thirds through the mini-masterpiece that is the script so far, (that is I’m assuming it’s a mini masterpiece, I’ve not read it yet!).  I, on the other hand have been carefully making a visual list of exactly what pieces of scenery and puppets I will need to make.  I just finished this yesterday.

In the process, I have drawn my first sketches of what I want the witch to look like.  My personal early memories of the Hansel and Gretel story as a child were very much tied up with a picture book I had of the story.  In this version of the story, it seemed to me that the scariest and most memorable part was the fact that the witch appears to be exactly like the most harmless and sweet old lady you’re ever likely to meet.  The fact that she is really the most evil kind of witch there is, the sort with red eyes, was one of the most exciting bits of the story.

So it seemed to me that one of the most important themes of the show should be the difference between appearance and reality.  The witch should be like her liquorice house, seemingly sweet and good but dark on the inside.

Given the above, I was astounded to discover the amount of stage and film versions of the story I found with very “witchy” witches, with black conical hats, black cats etc.  The source stories also vary quite a lot.  The original stories were, for example, changed in various ways to create a more Christian message.  So basically we just decided to go with the different bits of the stories we liked best.

Another interesting thing about the witch in the story, is that for a witch, she doesn’t do much magic.  The only magical thing about her seems to be that she has a house made out of food that doesn’t go off or get eaten by animals.  The main thing that seems to mark her out as a witch is that she is evil and eats children.  Then there is the question of whether the bird that leads the children to the house is a familiar of the witch or whether the bird is part of a number of instances in the story where nature favours the children.

I am not going to show any of our sketches of the characters at this stage as I do not want to spoil the surprise.  What I will show you however, are two of my favourite versions of the story I found on You tube.  A shadow puppet film by the marvellous Lotte Reiniger and a very early feature length stop motion animation based on the opera by Engelbert Humperdinck, (not the singer – the singer got the name from this guy).  Considering how early this film is, the quality of the animation and the “acting”, facial expressions etc. are amazing! A definite rival to Disney, and deserves to be better known.  The witch in this one is very witchy and the father is just a bit too gleeful about the nasty things the witch will do to the children, but it is none the worse for that.  I like a bit of quirkiness myself, Enjoy!